لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
four. Record shows that the petitioner continues to be booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Although the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, create that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to your court in which the case has been or will be filed.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced into the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC website HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
When the petitioner is actually present for the place of incidence without causing any injury to your deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided from the realized trial Court after recording on the evidence.
The scrupulous reader may have noticed something over: a flaw. Beyond the first seven words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
ten. Without touching the merits in the case of your issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment being made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for becoming entitled for being viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, just isn't without logic as the officer that is at first inducted into a particular post needs to provide within the claimed post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a befitting way.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--